Volume 13, Issue 3 (Summer 2016 -- 2016)                   ASJ 2016, 13(3): 197-199 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohamadi Y, Toolee H, Hassanzadeh G. Bilateral Variation of Internal Iliac Artery. ASJ. 2016; 13 (3) :197-199
URL: http://anatomyjournal.ir/article-1-154-en.html
1- PhD student Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- PhD Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (672 Views)

Understanding anatomical variations can help physicians achieve better results in clinical practice. During routine dissection, we found variations in the branches of Internal Iliac Artery (IIA) of a 65-year-old Iranian female cadaver. The IIA ended by dividing to an unusual smaller anterior and a greater posterior trunk which was branched to the inferior gluteal arteries. Both pelvis and the uterine artery were separated from the umbilical artery in the left side. In addition, the left iliolumbar artery arose from the main trunk of IIA. Although this cadaver had some uncommon variations, the findings are significant from clinical perspective.

Full-Text [PDF 580 kb]   (183 Downloads)    
Type of Study: News and Reports |
Received: 2016/02/15 | Accepted: 2016/05/6 | Published: 2016/08/1

1. Standring S. Gray's anatomy: The anatomical basis of clinical practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
2. Abou-Foul AK, Borumandi F. Anatomical variants of lower limb vasculature and implications for free fibula flap: Systematic review and critical analysis. Microsurgery. 2016; 36(2):165-72. doi: 10.1002/micr.30016 [DOI:10.1002/micr.30016]
3. Al Talalwah W. Internal Iliac Artery Classification And Its Clinical Significance. Classification of the internal iliac artery and its clinical significance. Revista Argentina de Anatomía Clinica. 2016; 6(2):63-71.
4. Chase J. Variation in the branching pattern of the internal iliac artery [PhD thesis]. Fort Worth, TX: University of North Texas Health Science Center; 2016.
5. Adachi B, Hasebe K, Daigaku K. The artery system of the Japanese. Kyoto: Imperial-Japanese University at Kyoto; 1928.
6. Braithwaite J. Variations in origin of the parietal branches of the internal iliac artery. Journal of Anatomy. 1952; 86(4):423-432. PMCID: PMC1273694 [PMCID]
7. Sakthivelavan S, Aristotle S, Sivanandan A, Sendiladibban S, Felicia Jebakani C. Variability in the branching pattern of the internal iliac artery in Indian population and its clinical importance. Anatomy Research International. 2014; 2014:1-6. doi: 10.1155/2014/597103 [DOI:10.1155/2014/597103]
8. Kiray A. Anatomical variations of iliolumbar artery and its relation with surgical landmarks. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2010; 44(6):464-68. doi: 10.3944/aott.2010.2347 [DOI:10.3944/AOTT.2010.2347]
9. Foster TR, Chin JA, Brownson KE, Bai H, Dardik A. Embryological basis for vascular anomalies. Amsterdam: Springer; 2016. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-14874-8_27]
10. Bleich AT, Rahn DD, Wieslander CK, Wai CY, Roshanravan SM, Corton MM. Posterior division of the internal iliac artery: anatomic variations and clinical applications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007; 197(6):658. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.063 [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.063]
11. Nosher J, Siegel RL, Bodne L. Interventional Radiology: A Multimedia Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2001.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb