Volume 12, Issue 4 (Autumn 2015)                   ASJ 2015, 12(4): 153-160 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nazem M N, Sajjadian S M, Vosough D, Mirzaesmaeili A. Topographic Description of Metacarpal Tendons and Ligaments of Anatoly Donkey by Ultrasonography and Introducing a New Ligament. ASJ 2015; 12 (4) :153-160
URL: http://anatomyjournal.ir/article-1-119-en.html
Topographic Description of Metacarpal Tendons and Ligaments of Anatoly Donkey by Ultrasonography and Introducing a New Ligament
Mohammad Naser Nazem 1, Sayed Mohsen Sajjadian2 , Dariush Vosough3 , Ali Mirzaesmaeili3
1- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
2- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
3- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Abstract:   (7218 Views)

Introduction: Topographic anatomy of the tendons and ligaments in healthy cases provides a normal atlas to diagnose abnormalities. The aim of this study was to provide ultrasonography description of the palmar tendons and ligaments of the Anatoly donkey.
Methods: The metacarpal regions of 6 healthy Anatoly donkeys were prepared for ultrasonography and divided to 6 levels (1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b), each 3 cm long apart. For better description, 2 left and right forelimbs were anatomically studied too.
Results: All the structures started to appear with an acceptable contrast and visibility at 1b level. Echogenicity of deep digital flexor tendons (DDFT) from 2b level was hyperechoic to isoechoic compared to superficial digital flexor tendons (SDFT) and suspensory ligament (SL) from this level observed the branching area was hyperechoic in comparison to DDFT and SDFT; however MSL and LSL were hypoechoic compared to SDFT and DDFT. Also the inferior check ligament (ICL) and new discovered ligament (second superior check ligament) had been detected in both anatomical and ultrasonographic studies. There were not any echogenicity differences between right and left forelimbs.
Conclusion: Previous investigations have proved that there is no difference between the echogenicity of each ligament and tendon at different levels in the left and right limbs which was confirmed in the current study as well. The findings of our study are also highly compatible with the previous findings in horses regarding echogenicity and shape of the palmar tendons
and ligaments. Generally it is assumed that transverse images provide a better image of tendons and ligaments.

Keywords: Ultrasonography, Palmar Tendon and ligament, Anatoly donkey, Second superior check ligament
Full-Text [PDF 828 kb]   (4433 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original |
Received: 2015/04/15 | Accepted: 2015/08/20 | Published: 2015/11/1
References
1. Hudson PE, Corr SA, Payne-Davis RC, Clancy SN, Lane E, Wilson AM . Functional anatomy of the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) forelimb. Journal of Anatomy. 2011; 218(4):375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01344.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01310.x] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Witte TH, Knill K, Wilson AM. Determination of peak vertical ground reaction force from duty factor in the horse (Equus caballus). Journal of Experimental Biology. 2004; 207(Pt 21):3639–3648. [DOI:10.1242/jeb.01182] [PMID]
3. Rantanen NW. The use of diagnostic ultrasound in limb disorders of the horse: A preliminary report. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 1982; 2(2):62-64. [DOI:10.1016/S0737-0806(82)80021-X]
4. Genovese RL, Rantanen NW, Hauser ML, Simpson BS. Diagnostic ultrasonography of equine limbs. Veterinary Clinical North American Equine Practice. 1986; 2(1):145-226. [DOI:10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30738-1]
5. Denoix JM, Audigie F. Imaging of the musculoskeletal system in horses. In: Hinchcliff KW, Kaneps AJ, Geor RF. Equine sports medicine and surgery. Basic and clinical sciences of the equine athlete. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2004, pp: 161-187. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-7020-2671-3.50014-3]
6. Nyland G. Veterinary Diagnostic Ultrasound, 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1995. [PMCID]
7. Denoix JM. The equine distal limb, an atlas of clinical anatomy and comparative imaging. London: Manson Publishing Ltd; 2000. [DOI:10.1201/b15219]
8. Schie HTM, Bakker EM, Jonker AM, van Weeren PR. Ultrasonographic tissue characterization of equine superficial digital flexor tendons by means of gray level statistics. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 2000; 61(2):210-219. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.210 [DOI:10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.202] [PMID]
9. Dowling BA, Dart AJ, Hodgson DR, Smith RK. Superficial digital flexor tendonitis in the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal. 2000; 32(5):369-378. [DOI:10.2746/042516400777591138] [PMID]
10. Schie JTM, Bakker EM, Weeren PR. Ultrasonographic evaluation of equine tendons: A quantitative in vitro study of the effects of amplifier gain level, transducer-tilt, and transducer-displacement. Veterinary Radiology Ultrasound. 1999; 40(2):151-160. [DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8261.1999.tb01901.x] [PMID]
11. Wood AKW, Sebgal CM, Polansky M. Sonogeraphy brightness of the flexor tendons and ligaments in the metacarpal region of horses. American Journal Veterinary Research. 1993; 54(12):1967-1974.
12. Schie HTM, Bakker EM. Structure-related echoes in Ultrasonographic images of equine superficial digital flexor tendons. American Journal Veterinary Research. 2000; 61(2):202-209. [DOI:10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.202]
13. Gillis C, Meagher DM, Cloninger A, Locatelli L, Willits N. Ultrasonogeraphic cross-sectional area and mean echogenicity of the superficial and deep digital flexor tendons in 50 trained thoroughbred racehorses. American Journal Veterinary Research. 1995; 56(1):1265-1269. [PMID]
14. McDiamid A. Ultrasonogeraphy of the palmar metacarpus and pastern in the horse. American Journal Veterinary Research. 1995; 17(8):368-376.
15. Genovese RL, Rantanen NW, Hauser M, Simpson BS. Diagnostic ultrasonogeraphy of equine limbs. Veterinary Clinical of North American Equine. 1986; 2(1):145-226. [DOI:10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30738-1]
16. Sande RD, Tucker RL, Johnson GR. Diagnostic ultrasound: Applications in the equine limb. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1998.
17. Cuesta I, Riber P, Gata M, Pinedo M, Gata JA, Castejon F. Ultrasonogeraphic measurement of palmar metacarpal tendon and ligament structures in the horse. Veterinary Radiology Ultrasound. 1995; 36(2):131-136. [DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8261.1995.tb00232.x]
18. Budras KD, Sack WO, Rock S, Wünsche A, Henschel E. Anatomy of the horse. 5th ed. Frankfurt: Schlutersche; 2009.
19. De Lahunta A, Habel RE. Applied veterinary anatomy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders Company; 1986.
20. Murray RC, Roberts BL, Schramme MC, Dyson SJ, Branch M. Quantitative evaluation of equine deep digital flexor tendon morphology using magnetic resonance imaging. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasonography. 2004; 45(2):103-111. [DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04017.x]
21. Maoudifard M. [Principles of ultrasonography of tendons and ligaments in the horse (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 2008; 2:72-81.
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.