<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Anatomical Sciences Journal</title>
<title_fa>مجله علوم تشریح</title_fa>
<short_title>ASJ</short_title>
<subject>Basic Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://anatomyjournal.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>17286158</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>17286158</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.32598/ASJ</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1400</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2021</year>
	<month>9</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>0</volume>
<number>Accepted Articles</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>Coracoid Process Morphometry and Its Relationship with Scapular Parameters: A Three-Dimensional CT and Dry Bone Study in an Iranian Population</title_fa>
	<title>Coracoid Process Morphometry and Its Relationship with Scapular Parameters: A Three-Dimensional CT and Dry Bone Study in an Iranian Population</title>
	<subject_fa>Morphometry</subject_fa>
	<subject>Morphometry</subject>
	<content_type_fa>Original</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:115%&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:115%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;Abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Detailed knowledge of coracoid process morphology is essential for safe shoulder surgery and preoperative planning. Population-specific morphometric data may improve surgical techniques and implant selection. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between coracoid process morphometry and other scapular parameters using three-dimensional CT reconstruction and dry scapulae in an Iranian population.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; A total of 96 specimens (29 dry scapulae, 67 CT scans) were evaluated. Coracoid length, coracoacromial distance, scapular width, and scapular length were measured using a digital caliper on dry scapulae and using multiplanar reconstruction and volume-rendering techniques on three-dimensional CT images. Measurements were compared between methods, sex, and side using independent-samples t-tests and the Mann&amp;ndash;Whitney U test; correlations between coracoid length and other scapular parameters were assessed using Pearson&amp;#39;s correlation coefficient.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; No significant differences were observed between dry scapulae and CT-based measurements for coracoacromial distance, scapular width, or scapular length (P &gt; 0.05), while coracoid length showed a borderline difference between the two methods (P = 0.05). In CT measurements, males showed significantly greater scapular width, scapular length, and coracoid length than females (P &lt; 0.05 for all), whereas coracoacromial distance did not differ significantly between sexes (P = 0.27). Coracoid length demonstrated strong positive correlations with scapular length (r = 0.85, P &lt; 0.01) and scapular width (r = 0.71, P &lt; 0.01).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Coracoid process dimensions were positively associated with overall scapular morphology. These findings provide morphometric data that may assist preoperative planning and improve surgical decision-making in shoulder procedures. This study provides reference morphometric data for the coracoid process and scapular parameters in an Iranian population.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Tahoma;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Detailed knowledge of coracoid process morphology is essential for safe shoulder surgery and preoperative planning. Population-specific morphometric data may improve surgical techniques and implant selection. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between coracoid process morphometry and other scapular parameters using three-dimensional CT reconstruction and dry scapulae in an Iranian population.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; A total of 96 specimens (29 dry scapulae, 67 CT scans) were evaluated. Coracoid length, coracoacromial distance, scapular width, and scapular length were measured using a digital caliper on dry scapulae and using multiplanar reconstruction and volume-rendering techniques on three-dimensional CT images. Measurements were compared between methods, sex, and side using independent-samples t-tests and the Mann&amp;ndash;Whitney U test; correlations between coracoid length and other scapular parameters were assessed using Pearson&amp;#39;s correlation coefficient.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; No significant differences were observed between dry scapulae and CT-based measurements for coracoacromial distance, scapular width, or scapular length (P &gt; 0.05), while coracoid length showed a borderline difference between the two methods (P = 0.05). In CT measurements, males showed significantly greater scapular width, scapular length, and coracoid length than females (P &lt; 0.05 for all), whereas coracoacromial distance did not differ significantly between sexes (P = 0.27). Coracoid length demonstrated strong positive correlations with scapular length (r = 0.85, P &lt; 0.01) and scapular width (r = 0.71, P &lt; 0.01).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Coracoid process dimensions were positively associated with overall scapular morphology. These findings provide morphometric data that may assist preoperative planning and improve surgical decision-making in shoulder procedures. This study provides reference morphometric data for the coracoid process and scapular parameters in an Iranian population.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>Shoulder, Scapula, Coracoid process, Computed tomography, Morphometry</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Shoulder, Scapula, Coracoid process, Computed tomography, Morphometry</keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://anatomyjournal.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-468-2&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Razieh</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Mokhtari</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>razieh.mokhttari91@gmail.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846008001</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846008001</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Nursing, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran. </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Fatemeh</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Seif</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>sahar_s59@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846008002</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846008002</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Arak university of Medical Sciences and Khansari hospital, Arak, Iran. </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Parvindokht</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Bayat</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>s.medphy@gmail.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846008003</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846008003</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Anatomy, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran. </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
